![]() What you want is a 'convenience', not a 'basic function'. ![]() If they could code they would realise it's not so basic. Most people cannot code - but some seem pretty good at demanding functionality for something they perceive as 'basic'. ![]() If you feel that you would get a better product for less money elsewhere, then buy it. And most ppl neither can code, nor do they want to learn it when they buy a product with sophisticated functions, which lacks basic things to actually use that advertised functions. Otherwise i could just pay half the price and get a NAS from the competition. And most ppl neither can code, nor do they want to learn it when they buy a product with sophisticated functions, which lacks basic things to actually use that advertised functions.ĪllthatEvil wrote:PS: Those comments like "dont complain, code your own" arent very helpful, when ppl buy Qnap for their ecosystem. PS: Those comments like "dont complain, code your own" arent very helpful, when ppl buy Qnap for their ecosystem. Still hoping for a proper workflow and a native Qnap chrome/FF extension. Will use workaround for torrent, and Free Download Manager for everything else. Makes the whole download station thing useless for me. Most Apps and features are well though through IMHO, so missing such basic pieces of a normal workflow seems even more confusion to me.ĪFAIK there is an android app where i can add links, why not the same for chrome or FF? PC is needed for web interface anyway, and most ppl would download on their PC/Desktops/Laptops. I too am totally surprised, why such a basic function isnt included. I chose QNAP over Synology, because the app ecosystem seemed to be better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |